Decolonize Yoga

Title: Decolonize Yoga
Location: 16th street Mission Bart
Description: Decolonize Yoga is Purusha Yoga in the streets of the Mission District. Offered to anyone and everyone who wants to participate or just drop by to say hi. Liberate your mind. Occupy your heart.
Start Time: 17:00
Date: 2012-01-13
End Time: 19:00

Posted in Grassroots Economics | Leave a comment

An Introduction to hOur World’s Community Cooperative project Incubating Cooperatives with Time Bank Hours

20 October 2011

An Introduction to hOur World’s Community Cooperative project
Incubating Cooperatives with Time Bank Hours

Portland, Maine is the site of an innovative, grassroots economic project called hOur World. Two of the organizers, Linda Hogan and Terry Daniels, of this job-generating venture explain its origins and how it operates in this video. We need to note at the very beginning of Terry’s presentation he refers to the Depression Era experiences of Oakland’s Unemployed Exchange Association (UXA) and his inspiration reading their history. Since it’s founding over two years ago, JASecon has been circulating John Curl’s original research of the UXA as an example of the development of a grassroots economy during the last major financial crisis of capitalism.

Specifically, Linda and Terry based their new cooperative on a successful 15 year-old time banking community with 800 members, out of which hOur World is building a worker cooperative that utilizes the labor power of the time bank membership to serve the larger community. These two organizations are working together to economically weatherize homes for the frigid Maine winters. As they begin their fourth year of operation they plan to weatherize one-hundred homes in the Portland area.

The clever way that hOur World utilizes the strengths of each institution should be an inspiration and motivate all of us engaged in forging a viable bottom-up economy to imagine other cross-pollinating collaborations.

JASecon’s mission is to present a Big Picture view of the possible economic interrelationships that could benefit the development of community-controlled wealth. In the San Francisco Bay area, the fifty worker cooperatives demonstrate the viability of democratically run workplaces, but given the thousands of traditional enterprises in the area they are practically insignificant. However, if they are incorporated within the entire grassroots economy, an economy that puts “People Before Profit,” then their significance as a democratic model is amplified.

By “incorporated” we mean allied on various projects with, for example, non-profits utilizing volunteers in the expanding urban agriculture movement to create community goods, like food. Bio-fuels Oasis Co-op, for example, besides pumping bio-fuel also sells feedstock for urban poultry farmers. Rainbow and Other Avenues worker co-op food stores might be able to sell urban agricultural surplus to help sustain the plots. Inkworks Press, as another example, offers printing discounts to non-profit community groups.

There are also ways in which the other institutions of the grassroots economy can collaborate. For years now, non-profits have spun off mission-driven for-profit ventures, and further, alliances between land trusts and co-ops – worker, consumer and housing – and credit unions seems a natural development.

The collaboration that Hogan and Daniels developed in Portland will inform a similar project that JASecon has been working on in the SF Bay area with Bay Area Community Exchange. And we believe that their model of leveraging the labor power of time banks with the democratic control of worker co-operatives will inform other communities to develop creative, worker and community controlled enterprises.


Posted in Grassroots Economics | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

An Economy Turned Upside Down by Mira Luna

While mainstream America is hoping for federal economic reform, some social justice organizations have a radically different idea, and are organizing low-income communities to build a new economy from the grassroots up. Tired of asking for change from the top down, they are taking their economy into their own hands. Social justice organizations, having a strong membership base rooted in community, are ideal spaces to cultivate alternative economic projects, as relationships of trust and solidarity have been nurtured over time through education and a history of taking action for justice. Here are some exciting examples of grassroots alternative economy projects for social justice.

Social Justice and Alternative Economics

Photo of the Greenfield Gardens housing coop via ADP.

Alliance to Develop Power (ADP) is social justice organization based in Massachusetts with a membership of 10,000 low-income African Americans and Latinos. According to Sally Kohn of the Nation, ADP has stated that “at the end of every issue campaign, our goal is to create an institution that our members control.” This a lofty goal for an organization that fights for basic necessities, like housing, on a regular basis. ADP is creating a 1,200 unit tenant-owned housing cooperative, a worker coops to provide landscaping, construction, building maintenance and weatherization for the homes, as well as four volunteer-run food coops for local health food access.

In what appears to be an emerging trend, San Francisco’s PODER (People Organizing to Demand Environmental and Economic Rights) expresses similar goals. Oscar Grande, Community Organizer for PODER, said they “aspire to be ADP when they grow up.” Every year, PODER fights to get City Hall to allocate funding for its economically disadvantaged community. It’s a battle that consumes most of its energy, and in the end the community rarely gets what it needs. This year, PODER moved beyond reactive social justice campaigns to explore the uncharted territory of proactive alternative economics with its members. It leveraged a strong community base to get funding to plan a work force development center in the neighborhood with the membership’s input. Based on members’ interests, PODER is developing an exchange group through BACE Timebank, which members hope will help support their Semillero worker coop incubation project. And the organization is investigating participatory budgeting as a tool to shift power to its membership in the municipal budget-making process in order to fund more community-driven initiatives, like worker coop training programs.

Self-Employment for the Working Class

La Cocina photo by Jun Belen.

A common path to a living wage and dignified job is self-employment through starting a small business, but this avenue is rarely available to working class women. Catering to this demographic, San Francisco’s nonprofit La Cocina provides food business planning and development, as well as access to costly resources such as a licensed commercial kitchen, a fancy retail space at the Ferry Building, professional advertising, and more. La Cocina incubates a wide variety of small businesses from packaged food producers to food carts, catering companies to restaurants. With an industry average failure rate of 60% even in a good economy, La Cocina gives struggling first-time entrepreneurs crucial support to get a business going without taking a huge risk many of them can not afford.

Worker Cooperative Incubation and Development

Meanwhile, a more communal twist to entrepreneurial development is popping up across the country: worker cooperative incubation programs for low-income folks. Third Coast Workers for Cooperation, a new nonprofit in Austin, is helping start-ups through a through a mentoring and 16 week training program, the Cooperative Business Institute and Co-op for Community Development program. In their first year, it helped incubate a women’s catering cooperative called Yo Mamas, a food cart coop in Houston, and the Workers Defense Project, a construction coop. Operating on a shoestring budget, TCWC uses volunteer but experienced worker-owners and professionals with technical skills to give these new coops a much needed boost.

Green Worker Cooperatives is another social justice organization “dedicated to incubating worker-owned and environmentally friendly cooperatives in the South Bronx.” Their website states, “Our approach is a response to high unemployment and decades of environmental racism. We don’t have the luxury to wait for new alternatives. That’s why we’re creating them.” Green Worker Cooperatives offers an aggressive 80 hour coop boot camp, which includes a combination of training, coaching, and technical support like legal incorporation, graphic design, and website development. IDEPSCA, an immigrant and worker rights organization in the Los Angeles area also incubates green worker cooperatives such as Magic Cleaners, a green home cleaning service, and Native Green, a sustainable landscaping service focused on native plants.

The Cooperative Association Model

Photo courtesy of the Arizmendi Association of Cooperatives.

Inspired by the Mondragon Cooperative Corporation of Spain, the Arizmendi Association of Cooperatives in the San Francisco Bay Area focuses specifically on one type of replicable restaurant. Their successful chain-like model is responsible for 125 jobs and $12 million in annual sales. Each Arizmendi Coop is autonomous, but receives training and substantial start-up funding from previous restaurants. In return, once the restaurant turns a profit, it returns some of the proceeds to the Association to seed more worker cooperatives. The restaurants share recipes, accounting, legal and other services, similar to corporate chains. True to their social justice mission, Arizmendi hired 4 out of 15 new worker-owners for their new Mission location from PODER’s membership and other Latinos from the neighborhood.

Clementina Paramo, a founding member of Emma’s Eco-Clean in Redwood City. Photo courtesy of WAGES.

WAGES, a nonprofit that started with the mission of “promoting the social and economic wellbeing of low-income women” organizes low-income women of color to collectively own green cleaning businesses in the San Francisco bay area. Over 100 cleaners earn “50-100% more in hourly wages than before” with benefits and business equity, according to Deborah Warren and Steve Dubb in the study Growing a Green Economy for All [PDF]. As former director Hilary Abell clarified in a recent GEO article, WAGES operates on a chain model with a year-long startup phase and three years of significant nurturing. While managed intensively by WAGES in the beginning (governance, finance, administration, recruitment, training and business management) chains become more autonomous over time, allowing workers to focus on providing good service and supporting their families. They remain connected and share professional services after spinning off, and seed new coops from the profits of the collective.

WAGES Training Group. Photo courtesy of WAGES.

With support from the City of Cleveland, University of Maryland, the Cleveland Foundation and $5.8 million dollars in grants and loans, Evergreen Cooperatives created three large worker coops focused on solar energy, industrial green laundry, and urban farming. Evergreen intentionally hires from economically disadvantaged neighborhoods, in particular people coming off welfare, recently out of jail, or having other barriers to employment. The wages are good for the laundry industry and worker-owners are expected to build equity in their businesses, which could yield $65,000 over eight years of investment. One of Evergreen’s coops, Green City Grower Cooperatives, has acquired 10 acres of urban farmland, a packing building, offices, green energy, and the “largest urban food-producing greenhouse in the country” in an area that could be called a health food desert. Crucial to the success of their cooperative start-ups is a revolving loan fund, the Evergreen Cooperative Development Fund, supported by 10% of their cooperatives’ annual pretax profits, reports Warren and Dubb. Being part of a larger, successful association also helps secure business loans, which can be difficult for coops.

Worker Coops for Local Job Creation

Other cities with skyrocketing employment such as Richmond, California are showing interest in emulating Evergreen and Mondragon. The Mayor of Richmond recently went to Spain for a study tour of Mondragon and hired a Coop Developer for her office. Worker coops are increasingly seen by legislators as being a serious avenue for long-term, local job creation.

Since worker coops are owned and managed by workers, there’s no worker exploitation, excessive executive pay, or inordinate investor returns. Therefore, worker coops can provide more stable, living wage jobs with benefits and equity than conventionally-modeled businesses, according to the Canadian Ministry of Industry and Commerce. Coops can adjust salaries in lean years, typically have flexible and favorable long-term financing, and are less likely to lay off or close up shop for the sake of profits. They are also more likely to take care of the local environment and their patrons because they need the support of their community to survive.

However, as PODER’s members quickly realized, without initial support from nonprofits, government or foundations, starting a worker coop can be an overwhelming, almost impossible challenge. The long-term benefits of these social justice missions are clear. Local governments and community foundations need to step up to the plate and support these social justice organizations’ new and innovative job creation model.

Nonprofit Co-production

On the nonprofit side of the economy, co-production — a philosophy and practice that incorporates cooperative principles — is being integrated into service provision. Co-production refers to the inclusion of service recipients in the design, decision-making and delivery of nonprofit services. Normally, there exists a chasm between a privileged class of professional service providers and their clients.

St. Louis’ Member Organized Resource Exchange (MORE) thinks and does things differently. MORE is “shaped and operated by the…same individuals it exists to help,” reported Louis Wright in a Case Study of MORE. Residents of East St. Louis are trained to help provide community childcare, education, eldercare, healthcare and social work support to each other while being paid in Time Dollars and then train others to do the same. As one resident put it, “finally, I can ask for help without feeling like I’m asking for charity, because I earned it. I helped somebody else and now I can buy service with my Time Dollars.” Residents provide community needs assessments, offer direct services, serve as community resource people for neighbors on their blocks, and design new service programs with the support of staff, sometimes becoming staff themselves.

Local Government Participatory Budgeting

Photo of the Chicago participatory budgeting vote by Austin Smith, courtesy of Gapers Block.

Change is brewing on the local government front too. While residents of other municipalities around the country complained about city budget cuts this year, Chicago’s 49th Ward let its residents directly vote on their Ward’s capital budget. Residents, including undocumented people and youth, held neighborhood assemblies, formed issue committees, created proposals and directly voted on budget proposals. It’s a drastic departure from corrupt back-room business deals and poor people left begging for crumbs from a budget that’s already been decided. Even the process of designing the participatory budgeting process is controlled by the residents themselves from the bottom up.

When describing his experience of participatory budgeting to San Francisco legislators, Chicago’s 49th Ward Alderman showed what his budget looked like before and after the process. The budget graph showed an astounding increase in diversity and creativity of funded projects with community participation. Through this process, he realized he only had a tiny piece of the picture of what his community needed and what they could come up with through collaboration. Bottom-up budgeting processes may be slower, but if they get the right results, they are surely worth the time and effort.

A New Path to Economic Freedom

Folks at the bottom of the economic pyramid are not only finding ways to individually climb the path to realizing the American Dream. They are building ladders for others and organizing to flatten the pyramid, sharing a collective dream in which no one is left out and everyone is happier because of it. It is also becoming increasingly obvious that for most poor folks, the only way up is together. What would the economy look like turned upside down? As these experiments demonstrate, it might look a lot greener, more cooperative, participatory and fair.

This article originally appeared in Shareable.
Shareable is a nonprofit online magazine that tells the story of sharing

Posted in Grassroots Economics | Leave a comment

How to Start A Worker Co-op by Mira Luna


In the age of unemployment, downsizing, and outsourcing, where can a poor soul find a job? Well, maybe it’s time we create our own. Self-employment is an option and can seem freeing, but it’s hard to do everything yourself and find time for a non-work life. The worker coop is an alternative to the isolation of self-employment and the exploitation of traditional jobs.

Worker coops can be more satisfying than working for the man. Worker-owners aren’t forced into a hierarchy, and they have more say over what the business does than traditional employees. You still have to be responsible managing a coop, maybe more so, but your coworker-owners will likely be nicer and more understanding of personal needs and quirks than middle-management at any corporation. You will probably make more money by cutting out the investors and managers, unless you were one of them, in which case: welcome to egalitarianism! In typical low-paying industries, worker-owners can make several times what they were pulling in as employees. For example, in Petaluma, California, Alvarado Street Bakery worker-owners take home around sixty-thousand dollars a year – a Hell of a lot better than working for minimum wage. As a worker-owner, you are less likely to get laid off, both because coops prioritize steady employment over short-term profits, and because they are more sustainable than their conventional counterparts.

So what is a worker coop? It’s an enterprise owned and democratically controlled by its workers. There are endless variations on coops, which means there are many questions to consider before forming your own unique venture. Remember you are starting a real business, not a hippie commune! If you’ve never started a business before, you will need support – read up on how to start a firm, get advice from coop development organizations (listed below), and talk to coop-friendly lawyers and accountants. You will need a business plan, coop-specific legal incorporation documents, and capital to finance you in the beginning. Additionally, you will want an organization plan detailing how you will run your coop cooperatively.


Courtesy of Rainbow Grocery

One of the first barriers to starting a worker cooperative is finding others willing to be part of the initiating group. If you are working at a business that wants to be converted to a coop (whether the managers know it or not), you may already have your members. To find new folks, it may be helpful to send an announcement to any work-related listservs (like for groups interested in food justice, hackers, and even hippie communes) and post flyers at related businesses or job assistance centers in your area. Invite people to a meeting for your new enterprise or better yet, hold a general coop matchmaker start-up fair where people can meet, get to know each other and discuss first steps. Invite pre-existing coops to offer initial advice, then set up a listserv or wiki that helps people find each other by posting new coop opportunities on an ongoing basis. Some worker cooperative development organizations listed below can help with this.

Once you’ve gathered your initiating group, here are some questions to consider when forming a worker coop:

* What is your common goal and purpose? Fair employment for people of color, access to healthy food, sustainability, independent media, selling locally produced goods? This will make decision-making easier and get you through the tough times.

* Are you forming a new business or converting an old one? If it’s new, is there a market for your service or product, do you have a niche, what is your expertise? Being a coop gives you a leg up, but you still must provide a needed product or service that competes in the greater, cutthroat capitalist marketplace … until it collapses. If it’s a drowning business, is the owner willing to sell and how will you save it? You may need to make major changes to make it sustainable.

* Who will be on your team? It helps to have people in your crew with experience in your product or service, skills in running the different parts of a business (management, accounting, marketing, etc.) or at least friendly consultants on hand to do these things, as well as people skills (communication, meeting facilitation, decision-making). Your team needs to really be into the coop model, even if they learn the details later. Remember you will be making a long-term commitment to spending 40+ hours weekly together, depending on each other for survival, making major decisions together, and caring for each other (that sounds like marriage!).

* How will new worker-owners join? Trial periods are highly recommended – think dating, engagement, then marriage – no need to rush. Some coops have a buy-in requirement to become an official owner. This can be in an initial lump sum investment, periodic deductions from paychecks, or sweat equity contribution to demonstrate serious long-term commitment and give equal power. Training new worker-owners how to run the business as a cooperative is crucial – people are often trained in the business world to compete, control, and manipulate, not cooperate or communicate. On the other hand, people who are into cooperation often don’t have business skills or work-specific expertise. Your team really needs both.

* How will you manage your coop? Collectively, with rotating representative managers, professional hired managers? Usually big coops have more hierarchy and job divisions. Small coops tend to collectively manage and pitch in to run the different parts of a business. There is no one way, but democracy rules. Disguised and non-consensual hierarchies though can be particularly damaging to morale.

* How, when, and who will make decisions? Consensus, super-majority, majority? It helps to clarify the process in detail and delegate minor or certain types of decisions to individuals or committees so you don’t spend too much time in meetings. Believe me, long indecisive meetings have killed more coops than the financial crisis. On the other hand, transparency, inclusion and frequent communication maintain the cohesiveness and trust of the group. Consensus works in small groups that get along and have a lot in common. In bigger, more diverse groups, it can create enough inertia and conflict to stifle a business. I like using modified consensus (try to get everyone’s enthusiastic agreement if possible) and super-majorities as a good middle path. The key here is not voting-rule dogma but developing a communication process that allows everyone to be heard and resolve disputes fairly.

* How much money will you need and where will you get funding? From your new worker-owners, a loan from the former owner, a loan from a bank (try one that has loaned to coops successfully), or a grant for worker-coop start-ups? Be realistic about your budget – people may be leaving their lifeline paycheck and you need to make sure you have enough funds for everyone to make it until the business becomes profitable – or non-profitable if that’s your bag. One failed coop can give them all a bad rap.

Whew! That sounds like a lot of work. But worker-owners I’ve talked to say in the long run it’s totally worth it. There are resources listed below to help you get started, including worker-coop development organizations. Starting a new coop can create jobs, not just for you, but also for people who may have never had the opportunity to own a business or earn a living wage. Worker coops are part of a larger movement to create an economy that is democratic, just, and takes care of everyone. And it can start with you and your coworkers.


Courtesy of Box Dog Bikes

Reading Resources:

* The Worker Cooperative Toolbox
* Steps to Starting a Worker Coop -
* A Technology Freelancer’s Guide to Starting a Worker Cooperative

Worker Coop Development Organizations:

* The US Federation of Worker Cooperatives
* The California Center for Cooperative Development
* The National Cooperative Business Association
* The Network of Bay Area Worker Cooperatives (if in the SF Bay Area)

This article originally appeared in Shareable.
Shareable is a nonprofit online magazine that tells the story of sharing.

Posted in Grassroots Economics | Leave a comment

Food People Power – Mandela Foods Cooperative

Posted in Grassroots Economics | Leave a comment

A New Grassroots Economy

This article appeared in the June 13, 2011 edition of The Nation.

About the Author
Sally Kohn is the founder and chief education officer of the Movement Vision Lab (movementvision.org).

From the vantage point of national politics, it would appear that the greedy, inequality-dependent version of capitalism, which just two years ago was teetering at the brink of extinction, has managed to survive, even tightening its grip on our so-called democracy. After all, the most striking quality of the status quo is its perpetual resilience. So it’s even more striking when viable alternative models blossom from grassroots organizations led by the low-income people and people of color most often locked out of the status quo. It’s potentially revolutionary when these alternatives point to a new vision of real economic democracy.

One prime example is the $80 million “community economy” created by the Alliance to Develop Power, in western Massachusetts. ADP is a membership organization comprising roughly 10,000 mostly low-income African-American and Latino leaders. Traditionally, ADP does what most community-organizing groups do—address issues that negatively affect their members, agitate for change and build their base for the next fight. But in its twenty-two-year history, ADP has done things a bit differently. “At the end of every issue campaign, our goal is to create an institution that our members control,” says outgoing executive director Caroline Murray. ADP members don’t want to continually fight those who own the economy. “We want to own stuff, too,” says Murray.

It all started with housing. ADP was organizing public housing residents to demand that basic safety and repair standards be met. In 1995 some leaders realized that the law allowed nonprofits to buy federal properties to keep them affordable. Today ADP owns 1,200 units of housing, structured as tenant-run cooperatives. Meanwhile, in 1997, when going over the budget for its first housing cooperative, ADP member Terry Allen was shocked by the sizable line item for landscaping. “Why don’t we mow the lawn ourselves?” he asked. So ADP started a member-run landscaping business, a worker center for immigrant day laborers and several food co-ops. Today, 106 people are employed in ADP’s community economy and, perhaps most notably, their economy continued to grow even when the national economy contracted. This year there will be fifteen new jobs for ADP members to fill, weatherizing homes with money secured from the local utility company through an organizing campaign.

ADP is expanding its community economy based on ideas generated by other community-organizing groups. For instance, ADP’s growing work on weatherization was learned from People United for Sustainable Housing, in Buffalo, New York. Since 2005 PUSH has acquired more than fifty dilapidated housing units and lots to transform into affordable green housing. Community residents have learned building trades and even joined construction unions based on apprentice work refurbishing the homes. Meanwhile, in the third-poorest city in America, PUSH is showing that poor people can be at the cutting edge of the twenty-first-century economy.

Similarly, ADP will soon launch a money services bureau, following the example of Communities Creating Opportunity, in Kansas City, Missouri. There, in response to a lack of mainstream banking options for low-income residents and rampant payday lending with exorbitant interest rates topping 431 percent, CCO is creating a small-dollar lending program financed by regional banks and run by community leaders. In Kansas City neighborhoods that don’t have a single bank branch, the CCO program will soon provide loans ranging from $300 to $2,000. The interest rate will be 36 percent—still high, but much better than 431 percent. CCO has learned a lesson similar to ADP’s: organizing can’t just be about opposing problems; it must create community-owned solutions.

ADP will also start an urban farming program based on models in Kentucky. In that state, small family farmers belonging to the Community Farm Alliance won tobacco settlement money to transition to vegetables and other new crops. But local grocery stores kept buying their produce from out of state. At the same time, the mostly poor, black residents of West Louisville weren’t even getting the frozen, cheap stuff (while the Louisville metro area had an average of one grocery store for roughly every 13,000 residents, West Louisville and East Downtown had three grocery stores for 80,000 residents). CFA started a farmers’ market in West Louisville to connect rural farmers with urban consumer needs, which also created jobs for young people in the neighborhood. The alliance is launching a for-profit food distribution company that will service other food markets.

Similarly, in Buffalo, the Massachusetts Avenue Project has trained more than 350 young people in gardening, food systems and business while using vacant lots to grow and sell more than 5,000 pounds of affordable fresh produce to residents in the community. MAP also packages its own chili starter and salsa, sold in grocery stores throughout the region, and a new aquaponics facility will yield 25,000 tilapia in the coming year.

ADP has proven that local grassroots alternatives can be scaled—combining innovative ideas from around the country to build a significant community-based economy. ADP’s businesses even turn enough of a profit to fund significant portions of the group’s organizing work—which will ensure that ADP’s model keeps growing. But beyond the impact in western Massachusetts, ADP and these other examples point to a new economic philosophy for America, where we the people aren’t owned by business and capital; instead, we the people own the economy.

At a time when it’s hard to find progressive inspiration nationally—when propping up the wealthy and the status quo is repeatedly privileged over more equitable alternatives—the grass is a good deal greener outside Washington.

Posted in Grassroots Economics | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Report on the first International Commons Conference

Marc Mascarenhas-Swan has been working with political collectives and housing collectives for 20 years. He is a facilitator and trainer working in political education, challenging oppression in privileged communities, and collective organizational development.

Berlin, Germany. November 2010

At the invitation of the steering committee of the first International Commons conference, I went to Berlin to represent our project – Just Alternative Sustainable Economics.

The conference convened to both cohere some of the global forces working to support a commons- based paradigm/ and to share, discuss and innovate policy approaches locally/ and globally that can help take back and enhance the commons.

The commons has many manifestations and definitions, but in essence it is about reclaiming and Sharing resources that belong to everyone and defending traditional or building new social and Institutional systems for managing those resources in equitable, sustainable ways. It is about fighting Corporate or even parliamentary enclosures of water, air, genes, culture, land and much else.” International Commons Conference 2010

The conference itself was hosted by the Heinrich Boll Foundation, a political /foundation affiliated strongly with the German Green Party. The well organized conference, with simultaneous translation, meals, and multiple spaces for sessions was well attended, with about 180 participants who had been invited by the host committee.

A lot of the details of the conference and its structure can be found at the conference website, and the conference wiki.

The conference attendees covered a wide and often unwieldy variety of backgrounds. The majority were academics, writers, researchers and leaders of ngo’s, and a smaller contingent were practitioners of the commons. A few were activists organizing communities to fight the erosion of our commons.

The fight for the commons has two interlinked aspects. The work of defending the commons, or resistance based struggles for our shared resources; and, secondly, the work of building the commons from the ground up. The chief challenge of the conference, as I saw it, was that many of the best practitioners of these aspects of reclaiming the commons do not think of themselves as doing so, and therefore were not in attendance. For example, I tend to think of the landless Peoples Movement in Brazil as one of the main forces in the world working to fight for, and maintain the commons, however as I understand it, they wouldn’t think of themselves in this regard. The conference attendees reflected this contradiction.

There were groups like ours, whose work could be defined as commons-based, but do not see themselves in this way – for example urban farm collectives, worker cooperatives, and technology sharing websites. And there were those who more fully believed, and advocated intellectually for the commons, but were not involved in the on the ground work it takes to build it, to win it back. This combined with coming from such varied backgrounds left me feeling very ungrounded.

Although participants came from over 30 countries, the bulk came from the global north. This reflected the logistical difficulty in bringing folks from the global south, and we can only speculate on the other reasons for the underrepresentation – a lack of connection to commons struggles in the global south perhaps, or the language of ‘the commons’ being different in the global south.

A key exception to this was the presence of the Ecuadorans, Alberto Acosta, Minister of the Economy, and Maria Fernanda Espinoza, Minister of Patrimony. They spoke chiefly on the plan to persuade the economies of Europe and North America to pay for preservation of their national forests, as an alternative to drilling for oil reserves located there. But other interesting points included the movement from GDP to Gross Domestic Happiness, and from traditional development to good living; the recognition of natural resources having their own set of rights – as objects, not subjects (and the guarantor of these rights with society); and lastly, the resurrection of the native concept of Minga. Minga is the gathering of community members to complete a task that benefits all of the community. It is considered each individual’s obligation to the community. To earn water rights and community voting rights each member must fulfill the obligation. This concept resembles the governing structure of all common resources.

Following the presentation from Espinoza, Richard Pithouse, from South Africa, responded with some useful points, specific to Espinoza and, in general, for the conference attendees. He pointed out that we need to be grounded in the real, immediate needs of the people. People need jobs, food, and clothing, without popular support based on addressing these needs we can’t win. The struggle for the commons is not only a mental shift (a theme that came up often during the conference), but also we have to acknowledge that there are material interests invested in enclosure, and they defend these interests using violence. For urban dwellers in the global south, what can the commons do?, Pithouse asked, the people can’t return to the land, they have been dispossessed.

There were numerous sessions, conversations and debates that colored the conference, but the last session, which was self organized, was the most enriching for me. It encompassed two key conversations: firstly, “The commons vs. the rights of Mother Earth?” – to raise the question of the relationship between these two key global paradigms for framing social change; and secondly, understanding the move to an incorporated and globalized “green economy”.

The Universal Declaration on the Rights of Mother Earth came out of the World People’s Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth, Cochabamba, April 2010, and is considered by many to be an organizing principle for a global movement for Earth Justice. Pacha mama is related to the indigenous cosmology where human rights are indivisible from earth rights. Using this principle a theme that emerged in the conversation was understanding the need to balance our human right to the commons with responsibilities to the earth, a broader responsibility than the commons principle of maintaining resources to be passed on to future generations of humans. Furthermore, the rights of mother earth framework pushes us to create balancing mechanisms in terms of justice, as a counter point to property rights. The general tone of the room was that these two worldviews are at least sister struggles, rooted in different cultural histories. The conversations helped me to generate strategic thinking about how to reclaim and build the commons that is rooted in the leadership of the global south and poor communities in the global north, addressing questions around human rights, earth rights, and addressing concrete human needs.

It was interesting to hear how the “Green Economy” is going to be a key narrative of global capital over the next 10 years – this will function essentially as land grabs for wind and solar resources, for biomass exploitation for plant based fuels, and intensive patenting. The UN has a fast track agenda : define what a green economy is and design the governance for biodiversity and ecosystem services. The major challenge to the ecological commons will be “carbon rights”.

I left the conference with two key questions which I continue to struggle with.

Do we try to recapture the concept of a green economy, return to the concept of sustainable economies, or do we need something else? As global capital forms its story around the “Green Economy”, what is our story?

Is the commons a framing that can take hold in a North American context, or is this way for those supporters of the commons to evaluate community initiatives, and assess how to build and defend collective resources? Should we look at the commons movement as a “kindred movement”, something that the economic paradigm that we are encouraging is a part of, or as a gathering point?

Although the commons conference may not have been the beginning of a global movement to reclaim the commons, it provoked and expanded my thinking about the commons, in all of its complexities, and reminded me that there are practical ways of organizing our communities that precede capitalism, industrialism, and state socialism, and that can allow us to thrive together.

Posted in Grassroots Economics, Marc Mascarenhas-Swan | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Take a tour of the hackerspace Noisebridge

Inspired in part by the open source movement, public spaces are emerging where people congregate to share ideas, make cool projects, teach, and brainstorm on everything from coding to cooking. With no leaders, they have one rule: “Be excellent to each other.” Take a tour of the hackerspace Noisebridge, located in the heart of San Francisco’s Mission District, with co-founder Mitch Altman.


QUEST on KQED Public Media.

A KQED Multimedia Series Exploring Northern California Science, Environment and Nature.

Posted in Grassroots Economics | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Workers of the world, co-operate!

Tim Hunt looks at what role workers’ co-operatives could play in bringing about social change

With both Labour and the Conservatives attempting to appeal to left-leaning voters by encouraging the use of co-ops to provide public services, interest in these once-fashionable methods of organisation has been reignited.

But are they microcosms of the democratic society that we crave? Or do they hinder political change by taking people away from social movements and trade unions and into self-contained, competing and self-exploitative economic units? Workers’ co-ops clearly have massive advantages over authoritarian systems of workplace organisation – but do they have the potential to change the world?

Continue reading →

Red Pepper is a London based magazine of political rebellion and dissent, influenced by socialism, feminism and green politics.

Posted in Grassroots Economics | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Coop Housing 101 by Mira Luna

During college, I lived at a 32-member student housing cooperative where I had more fun there than I did in all my other years of college combined and met lifelong friends. I saved money by living there so I didn’t need to work through school, as the coop was owned by a nonprofit (consequently rent would get cheaper relative to inflation). The activists, artists and thinkers who lived there brewed new ideas which planted seeds in me that sprouted years later. We seized the opportunity to use common spaces for political and arts events that as regular tenants we would have never been able to host. The house created a vessel for whatever passion we wanted to manifest.

Continue reading →

Shareable is a nonprofit online magazine that tells the story of sharing.

Posted in Grassroots Economics, Mira Luna | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment